| ------ Original Message
-----
To Sir David-Andrew:
I agree with everything in your letter except one thing: Your
flawed claim that Larry Becraft is competent. IMHO he isn't.
I believe that if he appears competent, he just had a little bit of temporary
good luck.
The last time I challenged Larry Becraft, he crept away under a rock,
kinda like do cockroaches. See my Becraft Challenge at http://www.chrononhotonthologos.com/lawnotes/becraft.htm
But, don't blame Becraft for exposing himself to us. The real
blame goes to his handlers. They just don't seem to understand that
Becraft does not represent their interests well.
"Sir David-Andrew." wrote:
A Real
MASTERPIECE!
{Master Something or 'PHD',
though 'JD' is getting close! Anyways! lol.}
Greetings Shannon, Paul, SPIKER, Group and WORLD:Shannon,
I do believe it is going to be a glorious Memorial Day weekend. This
makes six SPIES caught DEAD out of gas. Epitaph: "I screwed
them all." Or, how about this one: "I gave them all the shaft, but
to my own demise I fell down the shaft." Shannon,
you just received your wish! Who says wishes don't come true?Paul,
what is this IF stuff? Are you always a doubting Thomas? You
can believe it, it's true! My! My! That's six SPIES in two weeks
that we have SMOKED, give me a second I need to reload! Dah! LOL!
I wonder who will be next, to throw
in their shoe?
See if I care, go head and threaten to sue.
It don't matter anymore, cause you're though.
I'd be lying, if I said that I did not have a
clue!
The house of cards is falling & these spies
don't know what to do.
Sir David Andrew (May 29, 2004)
Shannon, Paul and David, I thank you for your
free
time and free information. I am certain that Lonnie and hundreds
of other poor souls that have been sold for 30 piece of Silver,
also, thank you. Since, I have first hand knowledge in this matter,
I will give some free time (In fact, about seven hours, or was that
eight:
wow! it's ELEVEN! My how time does fly!) and
free information
on this very important matter up for discussion and review. By the
way, Larry, I certainly do not send greetings to you.
However,
I would hope that some day you would make amends,
that 30 pieces of Silver is not worth selling
a friend.
While I was in Jail, Larry Becraft gave me 30
minutes of his precious time and took $600+. A week later he
sent me a letter stating that he could not help {or was it, would not help!)
me; though, he attached several pages of Case Law that he thought might
be useful to me to justify his exorbitant fee. He left me to rot
in HELL for 704 days without ever being tried or convicted of any crimes.
The Judges and SAs in my Case paid [Well documented fact!] over $10,000
(taxpayers dollars) to various unscrupulous INDIVIDUALS (for their testimony,
opinions or services) to flush me down the tube, since a Judge did
not like my 'RELIGION' and 'Belligerent attitude! This HUMAN has
no conscience and very little morals; though he appears to be a likeable
guy when one meets him, but so didn't Al Bundy. Yip, Yip, Howlllll
!! {See BELLIGERENT CLAIMANT below and other important historical
quotations and references.} My good friend
Lonnie hired Larry Becraft to help him in a case, as well. When they
approached the Bench, Asquire Becraft plead Lonnie GUILTY without ever
counseling with his Client. Lonnie immediately raised OBJECTION,
with drew the PLEA, and discharged Asquire Becraft on the spot.
Asquire Becraft was giving Lonnie a good deal,
several years in prison for charges that weren't
real!
"Don't sacrifice your life or your career for anyone,
if it comes down to you or them, send flowers."
~~Robert Redford, Spy Games
Lonnie proved to be a well armed LAMB; since it was
apparent that the wolves had already secretly taken a vote without his
knowledge or consent. Attorners and BureaucRats have the same mentality:
'Mobacracy', a system in which your vote does not count.
"Democracy is two [or more] wolves
and a lamb voting on what to
have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb
contesting the vote."
~~ Benjamin Franklin
"Having an Attorner (a twister) RE-presenting oneself, is like having
an enemy's spy in ones base camp. Ones plans somehow end-up on the enemy's
counsel's table. Not a good strategy for wining a battle or a war."
~~ Sir David-Andrew. (2004)
Larry Becraft is a very knowledgeable Lawyer and
can be a good one, if you can afford to be the highest bidder; however,
he is a PAYtriot for profit and is too willing to sell his Clients to the
wolves for a fast buck.{See below: C.J.S. volume 7, section 2 and 4.}
"Few men have virtue to
withstand the highest bidder."
~~ George Washington
Now, to deal with issue within the Case, at hand.
First, I have personally know Bob Schulz for ten years and Lowell (Larry)
Becraft about equally as long. I do not question Larry's ability,
only his integrity and motives. He appears to only care about number
one. In the issues presented, it was not ethical for Bob to disclose
the contents of the CD, if he had agreed to such. However, his motivations
is not the same as Larry's. Yes, Bob (or at least WTP) stands to
profit, but the intention is to help others who are in need and cannot
afford an Asquire's exorbitant or extortion fees. Larry on the other
is not willing to help anyone in need unless they are willing to give him
their shirt off their back. I, also, see the disclosure may be detrimental
to Dick Simkanin's already bad situation.
The undisclosed Party's, from Texas, fears are well found, if the average
MORON attempts to use the contents of Larry's work they will probably go
straight to jail or pay very heavy penalties or both. By loosing
a very poorly prepared or presented case they definitely will do more harm
than good to the cause. I have discussed such issues with both men
and many others in the past. There is no quick fix or so-called silver
bullets, since we are faced with corrupt Courts and corrupt System,
which are using a stacked deck. That which applies in one
case may not apply in another case. Most Sheeple go off half cocked
improperly completing the paperwork, filing the paperwork improperly, or
filing in the wrong jurisdiction or venue or even failing to state or invoke
the jurisdiction. They frequently make or state claims without having
proper status, by which they cause great harm, resulting in erroneous or
misconstrued Decision. The worst being is that they have this great
idea that they can improve upon the work of a Lawyer of Larry's capabilities.
The paper usually becomes worthless; especially, when they try throwing
in the kitchen sink. The issue then become clouded and to confusing.
Larry, how would you like to go a round; Bob is good but I am better!
Bob and I, have already done this once together. Let's see now, if
I can give him a hand. I have read several of
Larry's works and they are well thought through and far better than most
Asquires; though, frequently he omits valid arguments that are winnable
or landmark issues. He refuse to explain why. I remember reading
a brief he wrote back 1998 or 1999, which he had the opportunity to almost
gut the entire IRS code and he refused to do so. Though, that
could prove detrimental to his very profitable business. Just think,
if the US Supreme ruled the Inferno Revenue Service Code as unconstitutional,
then what would Larry do to earn a living. People who seek profit
at the lose and misery of others make me sick. Larry's
writing, however, could be improved basically in grammar and punctuation
structure, which actually effect the legalese contained in the document.
But most Public Fool System Graduates do not possess knowledge, skills
or capabilities to master such an endeavor. I have attempted to educate
Folks, here, on the internet for the past four years; but 95% of my readers
keep on making the same technical errors day after day after day.
Some have even sent me nasty letters stating that it does not matter.
Well, Folks, your Public Fool mistakes do matter and someday it is going
to cost you dearly, if it already has not, because you were unwilling to
learn or change. Most Folks are no different than the average smoker;
they will keep on doing it, even knowing that it will eventually kill them.
There just good mindless Sheelpe, do what there master wants them to do;
NOTHING, except what taught or told to do. When I attempt to challenge
their minds, they want know by what authority or degree, everything to
them must come from the government, you see. Well I disagree, since
I serve the Higher Power that most do not see. I am enlightened
and the Luciferians hate me. The contract, itself,
is invalid, based upon what is stated in the following News Article.
It is an one sided adhesion contract. The contract give the party
of the first part total control reserving all rights and take most rights
of the second party. Leaving the second party as being totally incompetent
and incapable of handling his (its) own affairs in the issues of the contract.
The Attorner (twister) who is supposed to be the servant or employee has
by self made contract made self the master and his employer
(boss) to be his guardian proper. The party of the second part is
without protect from the Attorner. I quote, "IV DISCLOSURE. It is
agreed that Becraft shall exercise complete and exclusive authority regarding
the disclosure of the information and legal argument contained on the attached
CD to any other party." WHAT??? Did you
see it? Who in the HELL does this Attorner think he is? Oh,
I almost forgot, Most Attorner think themselves to be deities. They
are the MASTERS and ya'll are the SLAVES, property or persons of unsound
minds. Do you see it, now? The Contract states that "Becraft
SHALL exercise COMPLETE and EXCLUSIVE AUTHORITY regarding the disclosure...to
ANY other PARTY." Folks the is the words and attitude of a TYRANT,
a DICTATOR, not that of a servant or employee. Do you see it, now?
"TO ANY OTHER PARTY." It is okay for Larry to give a copy of the
CD to the opposing Counsel, the Judge, IRS Agents or ANY OTHER PERSON that
LOWELL BECRAFT JR 'GD' feels like giving it to; however, Bob on the other
hand is not even allowed to share it with his Wife. Larry, you are
full of 'BS'. The Contract is a 'NULLITY ON ITS FACE'; and
is therefore 'null and void'. LOWELL, you lose. Folks,
READ the article below. It is unbelievable. This contracts
violates the Thirteen Amendment to the US Constitution. Larry, slavery
is against the law. I would bet that Bob did not volunteer to sign
this contract; I suspect that you coerced him into doing so.
Larry, did I score a hit? You bet I have! What arrogance and
audacity, which you have! Come on, Larry, who deified you?
Where do you get off ordering a man not to disclose to his wife, the contents
of something that may effect her way of life and financial future?
Or, did you forget that they are partners? You are way out of line
on this one. It sounds Luciferian in design. Very similar to
some the Temple's oaths. Ochre, that hurt! Do I need tell these
Folks more.
I would, also, bet that you wish about right
now,
that you hadn't left me to rot in that cell, hungry
and cold.
Repent of your evil ways, least you, also, lose
your soul!
Folks, you have been WARNED!
In Yah's Service,
Sir
David-Andrew.
The
Herald of Manatee.
[Here
is a brain teaser. Who wishes to try? Can anyone, whether not,
trained in the ways of the Public Fool System, please, explain why the
large 'sign manual' above is to the right and in red? Can anyone
answer me, please. A farm boy of with high school education of the
early 1800's could answer this question with ease. Two thousand people
around the world have just received this letter and I suspect that less
than twenty can give the correct answer. In fact, I will be surprised
if more than two will correctly reply. Something is wrong with this
picture. Surprise me and give it a try. Or, are you too proud
and arrogant to try. "Man cannot learn, least first makes mistake!"
Prove me wrong, I do make mistakes. I know that Larry know why to
the right, but I wonder if he know why in red? Go ahead, Larry, take
your best shot, I certainly would like to own your house or maybe your
head. But I suspect that you probably have all the lawsuits that
you can handle right about now. Have you ever tried playing this
silly game without a 'full deck'? Most do not know what that means,
but oops, you cannot tell, you still have my money. Check Mate!
"Scotty, beam up, there is no intelligent life done here."]
So that, there is no miscomprehension,
here: (I do not UNDERSTAND.)
The term Attorney is from
the Latin term Attorn, meaning to turn and twist (to lie).
The term Esquire (Asquire)
is an apprentice Knight,
one who is learning
or PRACTICING to become a Knight.
(They are not Sirs, but
are "wantabees";
though quiet often
prove to be SOBs!)
Oh, the little bee is a busy soul!
He has no time for birth control.
That is why in times like these,
there are so many sons of bees!
~~ Arthur Beebe (1969)
"...(A) n attorney [THE COURT'S JESTER] occupies a dual position
which imposes dual obligations." His first duty is to the courts
[THE BLACK ROBED DEVIL WHO IS GOING TO PUT YOU AWAY] and the public [THE
STATE], not the client [A FOOL' S FOOL], and wherever the duties to his
client conflict with those he owes as an officer of the court in
the administration of justice, the former must yield to the latter." -
7 CJS § 4. "Clients are also called 'wards of the courts' in
regard to their relationship with their attorneys." - 7 CJS § 2. "Wards
of court. Infants and persons of unsound mind. Which one are
you? Davis' Committee v. Loney, 290 Ky. 644, 162 S.W.
2d 189, 190." - Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Ed. ALL ATTORNEYS
AND JUDGES HAVE AN ATTORNEY ON RETAINER TO RE-PRESENT
THEM; THEREFORE THEY ARE ALL PERSONS OF UNSOUND MINDS. THIS IS
MADNESS, BUT IT IS THEIR LAW. ~~Sir David Andrew. (January 1995)
Read: "Through the Looking" by Lewis Carroll; since you
see it is indeed all MADNESS and one must be careful not to fall done some
rabbit hole.
THE BELLIGERENT CLAIMANT
"The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded
to the passive resistant, nor the person who is ignorant of
his
rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a
fighting
clause. Its benefits can be retained only
by sustained
combat.
It can not be retained by attorney or solicitor. It
is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person.
The one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral suasion to testify {ANSWER
QUESTIONS}or produce documents {DISCOVER, What is your NAME? Diver's
License, please.} rather than make a last ditch stand, simply loses
the protection. Once he testifies to part, he has waived his
right and must on cross examination or otherwise testify as to the
whole transaction. He must refuse to answer or produce,
and test the matter in contempt proceedings, or by habeas corpus.
~~ 76 F. Supp. 538, 540 (1947)
Wake-up Folks! This is the LAW. All
cases are won by DEFAULT. The last player left on the playing field
WINS. It is war and should be played in the same manner as
a game of paintball. Let's play paintball!
The
history of the race, and each individual's experience, are thick with evidence
that a truth is not hard to kill and that a lie told well is immortal.
~ Mark Twain
"A
lie can travel around the world while the truth is putting on its boots."
-Mark Twain
"Forrest
Gump" so aptly put it, "Stupid is as stupid does."
"I
am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do something.
And, because I cannot do everything, I will not refuse to do the something
that I can do. What I can do, I should do. And what I should
do, by the grace of (Yah), I will do."
--
Edward Everett Hale
"...it
does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority
keen to set brush fires in People's mind..." -- Samuel Adams.
"There
are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at
the root." -- Henry David Thoreau
"A
Patriot is merely a rebel at the start. In the beginning of a change,
the Patriot is a scarce and brave man, hated and scorned. When his cause
succeeds however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a
Patriot."~~ Mark Twain
May
America accept Yah!
Death
to the New World Order.
We
are on the March.
The
Empire is on the Run.
With
Yah, We shall Prevail!
Without
Him we will Fail!
Sir David-Andrew.
(2004)
I Chronicles
7:14
-----
Original Message -----
To: wtpatltotrtf@yahoogroups.comSent:
Saturday, May 29, 2004 1:00 PMSubject: Re: [wtpatltotrtf] LEADER
OF TAX HONESTY MOVEMENT SUED
"A Product
Of Louisiana...Certified Cajun!" I
forgot to add....like Becraft doesn't have enough frns's....give me a freaking
break.....Becraft needs his a$$ kicked for this...he is a TRAITOR &
a PAY-TRIOT.Shannon
-----
Original Message -----
To: wtpatltotrtf@yahoogroups.comSent:
Saturday, May 29, 2004 12:28 PMSubject: Re: [wtpatltotrtf] LEADER
OF TAX HONESTY MOVEMENT SUED
"A Product
Of Louisiana...Certified Cajun!" Lowell's
name was Larry Becraft? I am speechless! Larry Becraft at this point
is a TRAITOR....I used to have respect for him....but NO MORE! This really
SHOWS what the HELL is going on here.....Becraft is a TRAITOR, if in fact
this is true!Shannon
-----
Original Message -----
To: wtpatltotrtf@yahoogroups.comSent:
Saturday, May 29, 2004 10:22 AMSubject: Re: [wtpatltotrtf] LEADER
OF TAX HONESTY MOVEMENT SUED
Another round
of in fighting, this is why the patriot movement can not get the
momentum going to rid our country of this evil. It's the same way in the
militia. I understand Becraft should be paid for the research it's his
work, but to say no one else can use it is chicken s#*t IMHO
-----
Original Message -----
To: wtpatltotrtf@yahoogroups.comSent:
Saturday, May 29, 2004 9:50 AMSubject: [wtpatltotrtf] LEADER OF
TAX HONESTY MOVEMENT SUED
Source:
NewsWithViews.com
http://www.newswithviews.com/
LEADER OF TAX
HONESTY MOVEMENT SUED
http://www.newswithviews.com/NWVexclusive/exclusive19.htm
Posted: May 29,
2004
by NWV Staff
Writer mailto:newseditor1@earthlink.net
Famed criminal
defense attorney, Lowell Becraft, Jr. http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft
, of Huntsville, Alabama, who has handed the IRS many a staggering defeat,
has filed a lawsuit against Bob Schulz, Chairman of We the People Foundation
for Constitutional Education, Inc. www.givemeliberty.org
, for the conversion and unauthorized distribution and sale of his research.
NWVs has obtained
a copy of the lawsuit based on the violation a non disclosure agreement
which was entered into between Becraft and Schulz on April 19, 2004. NWVs
has a copy of this signed non disclosure agreement which reads in part:
"II. NON-DISCLOSURE.
Confidential information ("Information") of the Parties and/or their assignees
shall mean information that the Parties desires to protect against unauthorized
use or disclosure, and which is furnished under this Agreement as: (a)
WRITTEN or other tangible information clearly marked with a notice such
as "Confidential"; and/or (b) ORAL information that is specifically identified
at the time of disclosure as being confidential, and then, within two weeks
after such disclosure, the information is described generally in a writing
marked as in (a). The referenced CD containing the above mentioned skeletal
outline of the correct application of the federal income tax laws and its
contented are deemed "Confidential Information". Schulz agrees that he
will not disclose, directly or indirectly, the contents of the referenced
CD or even any summary thereof to any other party without prior written
approval obtained from Becraft. Schulz further agrees that he shall not
duplicate or copy such CD in any way. Such CD shall remain the property
of Becraft and shall be returned when requested.
"This duty of
non-disclosure expressly includes any disclosure of the substance of the
legal argument contained on the referenced CD to Schulz's family members,
employees, friends, associates, clients, or any other parties, including
those employed by any government, either local, state or federal. Schulz
shall take such measures so as to insure that such legal argument is not
acquired by any other party in any manner not contemplated by this agreement.
In the event Schulz deems it beneficial for this legal argument to be disclosed
to any other party, he shall obtain Becraft's written consent.
"Confidential
Information shall not include information that: (a) is publicly disclosed
without a breach of this Agreement, (b) is known to the recipient prior
to the time of disclosure, or is independently developed by the recipient
without using any Information, or (c) is obtained from another source that
the recipient has no reasonable cause to believe is under any obligation
of confidentiality with respect to Information.
"III. PROTECTION.
The Parties agree that as a recipient of Confidential Information they
will treat it as proprietary and confidential, safeguarding the Information
at least as carefully as it would its own confidential information, and
will use all reasonable efforts to prevent any unauthorized use or disclosure,
including restricting access to the Information within its organization
to only those that the Parties agree shall comply with this Agreement.
A recipient will not disclose any Information to any third party without
prior written consent. Either party learning of any unauthorized use or
disclosure of any Information will promptly notify the other party, and
will reasonably cooperate with efforts to protect such Information.
"IV. DISCLOSURE.
It is agreed that Becraft shall exercise complete and exclusive authority
regarding the disclosure of the information and legal argument contained
on the attached CD to any other party. Any other individual to whom disclosure
of the same is desired shall be approved by Becraft and such party shall
execute a non-disclosure agreement reasonably similar to this non-disclosure
agreement."
Becraft provided
Schulz his research on a CD after Schulz signed the non disclosure agreement
on April 19, 2004. On May 10, 2004, Schulz, without written or oral consent
from Becraft, posted the entire contents of Becraft's CD (research) to
his web site with an offering that for $40.00, anyone could purchase Becraft's
research on a CD. This post declared that all proceeds would go to the
"anonymous researcher."
On or about May
11, 2004, again without Becraft's written or oral approval, Schulz, via
e-mail, informed his entire membership list, approximately 63,000 in number,
of the availability of Becraft's confidential work product on his website.
No mention was made that such research and work product was Becraft's and
belonged to him.
According to
Becraft, he never gave Schulz any permission to sell his research on a
CD ob Schulz' web site and had repeatedly attempted to get Schulz to remove
his work from WTP's site. "I never gave Schulz permission to sell my work
on a CD nor did I ever ask for the proceeds," declares Becraft. "All of
this was done without my permission and to say I was ambushed sided is
an understatement."
As a result of
Becraft's demand that Schulz remove the language offering his CD for sale
with proceeds going to Becraft, Schulz, against his long standing policy
of not changing the text in any posting on his web site, then changed the
offering in the original post May 10, 2004, to read: "Note: By request
of the researcher, ALL donations for copies of this research are being
donated to the Dick Simkanin Legal Defense Fund." Such a claim has been
emphatically denied by Becraft.
Since the posting
of Becraft's confidential work on Schulz' web site on May 10, 2004, Becraft
has by telephone and via e-mail, requested of both Schulz and his web master,
Mike Bodine, that the unauthorized disclosure of Becraft's confidential
work product protected under the non-disclosure agreement, be removed from
the Defendants' web site. All reasonable requests have been adamantly refused
by both Schulz and Bodine.
NWVs has obtained
a confidential memo from one of Schulz' strongest supporters in Texas which
reads in part:
"Again, I ask
that you please fall on your sword for the Tax Honesty movement and remove
Larry's work. Most people that try to use the work in the state that it
is in will not and do not know how to use it properly, which will most
likely result in long lasting negative effects on everyone else in the
movement..."
In response to
the question of what will happen to the tax movement as a result of this
lawsuit, a Washington, DC based attorney intimately familiar with this
dispute who wishes to remain anonymous, said, "The tax movement will still
continue. That isn't the issue here. The issue is that Schulz proceeded
in an unethical manner and violated a legal non disclosure agreement. He's
also in violation of certain copyright laws. The issue is accountability
and you cannot excuse this type of behavior just to preserve the illusion
of honest leadership."
Having exhausted
all efforts to get Schulz to remove his work and cease from selling it
on his web site, Becraft felt he had no other choice but to file a lawsuit
against him. To date, the misappropriated research and offering of the
CD remain on Schulz' web site.
© 2004 -
NewsWithViews.com - All Rights Reserved
Sign Up For Free
E-Mail Alerts
mailto:newsforyoulist-list-subscribe@newswithviews.com
Send comments
on this article to: newseditor1@earthlink.net
To Post a
message, send it to: wtpatltotrtf@yahoogroups.com
To Unsubscribe,
send a blank message to: wtpatltotrtf-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
We The People
At The Liberty Tree On The Road To Freedom
FREE MARK
KOERNKE http://www.pbn.4mg.com
Listen to
LIBERTY TREE RADIO: http://www.libertytreeradio.4mg.com
"God Bless
The Republic,
Death To
The New World Order,
We Shall
Prevail!"
Remember,
Mark Koernke is a POLITICAL PRISONER OF WAR!
Please write
to him at this address:
Mark Gregory,,Koernke
#295350
Hiawatha
Correctional Facility
4533 West
Industrial Park Drive
Kincheloe,
Michigan
Postal Zone
49786-0001
Shannon (Braveheart
May
America accept Yah!
Death
to the New World Order.
We
are on the March.
The
Empire is on the Run.
With
Yah, We shall Prevail!
Without
Him we will Fail!
Sir David-Andrew.
(2004)
I Chronicles
7:14
Though, referred
to as Samuel Adams by my good comrade Mark Koernke.
Let Mark
go! Let Mark go!
|
