|----- Original Message -----
From: Kay Lee
To: Kay Lee at Charter
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 3:55 AM
Subject: Mega-Millionaire Offers $100,000 Reward For Scientific Proof WTCTower
From: "T Lee Buyea Fla News Service" <email@example.com>
Mega-Millionaire Offers $100,000 Reward For Scientific Proof WTC Towers Collapsed As Bush Administration Claims
From Ilene Proctor
Proctor & Associates
CNN Poll 11-10-04: 90% Believe US Complicity In 911 Attacks
$100,000 REWARD to the first person to deliver a full mathematical, engineering proof of how the impact and/or fires caused any of the WTC buildings to collapse the way the government claims! It must include all the fuel, mass, critical temperatures, likely temperatures and their causes, energy needed to crush concrete into fine powder, force needed to sheer bolts and rivets, time calculations, and all the other relevant data in a detailed analysis to be reviewed by accredited engineers on a team headed by Jeff King http://911review.org/Wiki/King,Jeff.shtml, engineer and doctor educated at MIT.
$10,000 FIRST PRIZE for engineering students who can best prove how the buildings collapsed.
Ten $1,000 prize for runner-ups. For application: http://www.reopen911.org
~ DEADLINE: JUNE 30, 2005 ~
Passionately committed to democracy, multi-millionaire
Jimmy Walter, a Democratic philanthropist, announced that he would spend
an extra million dollars on advertising in addition to the $1,500,000 already
spent on another advertising blitz in America's most prominent
Walter first turned to paid advertising two years ago
when he saw the mainstream press self-censoring in support of the impending
Walter is still putting his money where his mind and heart are. In Mid-September, 2004, Walter funded the jam-packed Omission Commission in Manhattan: "Confronting the Evidence - a call to reopen the 9/11investigation." According to a recent Zogby poll: half of New Yorkers agreed that some US leaders "knew in advance that the attacks were planned on or around September 11, 2001, and that they consciously failed to act. Two thirds of the respondents called for new probe of the still unanswered questions by Congress and/or the New York Attorney General's office."
The Commissions' mandate was twofold - first, to expose a complete accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the 9/11 attacks; second, like the Independent Commission, to make recommendations. In this made-forbroadcast forum presenters had the task of laying out a compelling case for their evidence. The event's panel, composed of 9/11 victims, environmental experts, researchers, scientists, journalists and first responders, challenged some of the key data that had been the basis of the 9/11 Commission's investigations and pointed our many serious omission and incongruities. This event had paramount importance because earlier recommendations based on an incomplete accounting of the facts is not making us any safer, and will not protect us from a recurrence.
The Victims Family Steering Committee filed close to 400 questions with the 9/11 Commission. Initially welcomed by the commissioners as a "road map" for their inquiry, the Commission ignored the majority of these questions, opting only to explore system failures, miscommunications and incompetence. The victim families' most incisive issues remain un-addressed to this day. Their queries cut to the heart of 9/11 crimes and accountability. They raised the central issues of motive, means and cui bono (who profited?). The Omission Commission was created to lift the shroud of secrecy and unanswered questions surrounding the largest homeland tragedy in American history.