THE RIGHTS YOU HAVE (that the Judge and DA hope you don’t know!)
Street Law: Rights Police Don’t Want You to Know.
Grand Juries, Trials, Police Perjury etc..

IF IT'S NOT A RUNAWAY, IT'S NOT A REAL GRAND JURY!

CREIGHTON LAW REVIEW, Vol. 33, No. 4 1999-2000, 821
By ROGER ROOTS
"Today, the grand jury is the total captive of the prosecutor," wrote one Illinois district judge, "who, if he is candid, will concede that he can indict anybody, at any time, for almost anything, before any grand jury." Supreme Court Justice William Douglas wrote in 1973 that it was "common knowledge that the grand jury, having been conceived as a bulwark between the citizen and the Government, is now a tool of the Executive."
Click here to read the whole article


Testimony of Alan M. Dershowitz House of Representatives Judiciary Committee – Police Perjury

“….the corrosive influences of perjury in our legal system, especially when committed by those whose job it is to enforce the law, and ignored — or even legitimized — by those whose responsibilities it is to check those who enforce the law.”
Click here to read the report


“The City of New York, Commission to Investigate Allegations of Police Corruption and the Anti-Corruption Procedures of the Police Department, July 1994”

Mollen Report-Perjury by Law Enforcement (15 megs)
Milton Mollen - Chair

click here to view report: WARNING: large File.
Click here for PARC (Police Assesment Resource Center) Home Page


Police Perjury
1037 TESTILYING: POLICE PERJURY AND WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT

by Christopher Slobogin
Although testilying can occur at any stage of the criminal process, including trial, it usually takes place during the investigative and pretrial stages, since it is most frequently an attempt to cover up illicit evidence gathering.
Click here to read the whole article


Mansfieldism Reconsidered

By Jon Roland

Trial by Jury – What the Judge and DA hopes you don’t know.

We must keep in mind why the Founders established the right to trial by jury in the Constitution. It wasn’t to involve the public in the judicial process, or because jurors know the law better, or because jury verdicts would be more acceptable to the parties in cases. It was because judges, prosecutors, law enforcement officers, and other public officials, can’t be trusted. Even if not initially corrupted when they take office, they hold their offices for long enough that they can become corrupted, whether by bribery, intimidation, ambition, or the undue influence of sponsors or cronies. They often become biased by their official duties, prone to become arrogant, impatient, careless, or jaded and dismissive of the ways the specific facts in each case can affect what is the just disposition of that case. A jury of citizens selected at random, excluding only those prejudiced by their previous involvement with the parties and facts in the case, comes with a fresh perspective, and if protected from tampering, are more likely to render verdicts that accord with the public sense of what is lawful and just, in the long term.

To understand the jury system, people also need to understand why our ancestors adopted the number twelve as the number for a trial jury, or the number needed to decide in a grand jury, or that a trial jury be unanimous. A unanimous verdict of twelve derives directly from the principle that a jury decides not just whether the accused committed the act, but whether the act was unlawful.

The jury arose from the English system of common law, which included common law crimes. Without a statute defining what is and is not an offense, the jury, like the bench, had to decide whether the act alleged was a violation, based on custom and precedent. The emergence of criminal statutes made it easier, when the statute was well-written, to reach a verdict, but since a statute is necessarily written in general terms, its applicability to the facts in a case remained a matter for the jury. (Jury Nullification)
Click here for full report



The rights you have (that the Judge and DA hopes you don’t know!)


Jury Nullification
by Doug Linder (2001)
“Courts ….. in fact have taken several steps to prevent it. “
Click here to read the article


Law Review Article Collection

Click here to view more sources


Practical Legal Advice for All Americans

Family Law, Criminal Law, Accident Law, Personal Injury Law, Employment Law, Intellectual Property Law, Immigration Law, General Practice and Litigation Law
Click here to view


Just Cause Law Collective

They have really good tips!
  • What to say if you're pulled over while driving
  • How to read a search warrant or a subpoena
  • What you should know about undercover cops
  • How to handle police questioning and searches
  • What to tell the judge to get your bail reduced
  • How to get the best work out of your lawyer
  • What evidence you'll need to sue the police
  • And more

At “Just Cause Law Collective”

Learn even more practical law with their cartoons!
"Just Cause Law Collective" Home Page
Click here to view cartoon of "5 Finger Discount"
Click here to view cartoon of "Pocketful of Felony"


Back

Home